Author Archives: admin

Richmond Society Forum – Under New Management

Our Autumn Forum on Thursday 18thOctober provided an opportunity for Society members to meet the new administration running Richmond upon Thames Council since May’s elections.  We were pleased to welcome Council Leader Gareth Roberts, together with Deputy Leader Alexander Ehmann who has responsibility for Transport, Streetscene and Air Quality, and Martin Elengorn who looks after Environment, Planning and Sustainability.

Councillor Roberts opened the forum by setting out the administration’s three main priorities: making Richmond fairer, greener, and safer.  These would have to be delivered in the context of the scope of the limited powers available to local authorities and the financial constraints under which they operate.

A good example of these limitations was the central government cuts in policing that have led to the disappearance of routine police presence in Richmond and measurably reduced police performance against targets. Councillor Roberts recognised that this was unsatisfactory, both from the perspective of reported crime and low-level anti-social behaviour.  However, the Council had no powers to increase police resources so instead was focussing on crime prevention.

In response to questions, Councillor Roberts spoke about the merger of services with Wandsworth.  Some departments had good local knowledge of Richmond borough; others were still shaking into place.  It would not be practical, nor indeed affordable, to return to a more localised arrangement, so his focus was on making the current situation work well and delivering the best possible services within cost constraints.

Councillor Ehmann then spoke about the current consultation on introducing a 20 mph speed limit on all roads in the borough other than its two trunk routes, the A316 and the A205.  This proposal had been included in the LibDems’ manifesto in response to mounting evidence that at slower speeds far fewer accidents take place, there are far fewer injuries, and far fewer deaths.  This applies even more so to main roads than side roads, which is why routes such as the A307 Kew Road are included in the proposed 20 mph zone. Additionally, a piecemeal implementation of the zone could as much as double its cost with the extra signage needed, and make it less straightforward for motorists to follow.

It was expected that overall air quality would improve as a result of implementation.  In addition it would encourage walking, cycling, and the use of public transport.  Councillor Ehmann was keen to point out that the administration was not anti-car, but that its aim was simply to encourage people to shift to more sustainable forms of transport.

In response to questions, Councillor Ehmann explained that enforcement of the 20 mph zone would be as for 30 mph. There would be no additional police. Compliance by most drivers would lead to an overall reduction in speed, which would deliver the expected improvement in road safety.  In order to assess the effectiveness of the proposal, and to optimise it if it goes ahead, the Council has already started gathering speed measurements to establish a baseline.  They would not be implementing the modern-day equivalent of speed bumps, as these often lead to an increase in emissions when cars brake to avoid them and then accelerate to the next one.

Former councillor Frances Bouchier asked about the budgetary plans for improving safety for cyclists.   Councillor Ehmann responded that though the budget was limited this was an important priority.  They were reviewing the acclaimed Tower Hamlets scheme, and there was also a bid being made to the Mayor of London to improve the cycling route from Ham to Richmond. In response to a question about dangerous cyclists, he explained that his focus would be more on providing an environment where cyclists did not feel the need to misbehave than on enforcement.

Regarding the length of housing lists, Councillor Elengorn explained that this was a challenge.  The Borough of Richmond had a target of 300 new homes per year, rising to 800.  Failure to meet this target would result in the Council having to relinquish planning powers.  Their approach to resolve this is a “Green Growth Strategy”, which aims to provide quality homes on larger sites.  One site currently under evaluation is at Homebase by North Sheen Station. Additionally he reconfirmed that the Friars Lane Car Park, which was controlled by Property rather than his department, is still zoned for residential development.

Other areas covered included: possible reversion of the Old Town Hall to community use; providing the Museum of Richmond with a more accessible site; consolidation of Richmond’s libraries on the site of the current lending library on Little Green utilising the adjacent Queens Hall; increased pedestrianisation of George Street; the hope that over time the TfL buses that cause most of the air pollution will become greener; the future of the House of Fraser site; and the dilapidated state of some areas of the Riverside, which Councillor Elengorn promised to escalate.

We would like to thank Councillors Roberts, Ehmann and Elengorn for their time, and for providing a very informative evening.

Annual Awards 2018

Annual Awards 2018 logo. The Richmond Society’s Annual Awards for 2018 were presented on Thursday 20th September by the Mayor of the London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames, Councillor Ben Khosa.

Paul Velluet, who founded the awards programme forty years ago, introduced the evening with a review of the more significant winners over the four decades in which they have been presented.

This year’s brass plaques were given for the renovation of the Temperate House in Kew Gardens, and the renovation of the Great Pagoda, also in Kew Gardens.


Brass Plaque Award – The Temperate House, Kew Gardens:
Renovation

Annual Awards 2018: Temperate House, Kew Gardens.

Client
Royal Botanic Gardens
Andrew Williams
Architect
Donald Insall Associates
John Dangerfield
Contractors
ISG
Ramboll
Hoare Lea
Land Use Consultants
Butler and Young

Brass Plaque Award – The Great Pagoda, Kew Gardens:
Renovation

Annual Awards 2018: Great Pagoda, Kew Gardens. Client
Historic Royal Palaces
Rob Umney
Lee Prosser
Craig Hatto


Architect & Landscaping

Austin Smith Lord
David Millar
Catherine Cosgrove


Contractors

3D Systems – Nick Lewis
Hockley & Dawson
Blue Sky Building
PMJ Woodcarving Ltd

Commendation – Ancaster House, Richmond Hill:
Conversion and restoration, and development of new houses

Annual Awards 2018: Ancaster House.

Client
London Square
Mark Smith
Architect
PDP
Simon Gazzard
Contractor
London Square
John Fitzhenry

Commendation – Hogarth House, Richmond:
Conversion and restoration from offices to residential use

Annual Awards 2018: Hogarth House.

Client
Berwick Hill Properties
Architect/Designer
Donald Insall Associates
Jonathan Carey
Contractor
Birkby Construction

Commendation – Gothic Cottage, Richmond Circus:
New side extension

Annual Awards 2018: Gothic Cottage.

Client
Mr Damon Crane
Designer
Just Extend Your House Ltd
Malgorzata Kurzownik

 

With many thanks to Michael Izett for the photos.

 

Heathrow Airspace Design – Summer 2018 Update

At the start of this year, Heathrow Airport Limited (HAL) issued two consultations, covering Airport Expansion and the Principles of Airspace Design.  These are part of the process that Heathrow must go through to gain approval for expansion and for airspace changes that are needed for it.  Additionally, the principles for airspace changes will apply even if a third runway is not built.

The Richmond Heathrow Campaign responded to both consultations in March and our responses can be found on our website.  Our response to the Principles of Airspace Design was particularly critical of the apparent lack of strategy and the vagueness of Heathrow’s proposals. Heathrow have since provided further information on their proposals, to which the Richmond Heathrow Campaign responded in July.

The threats to Richmond are

(i) The potential for flights to take off overhead

(ii) Less hours of respite from the noise of planes coming in to land

(iii) A higher proportion of heavy, noisier aircraft approaching the airport overhead

(iv) A potential increase in night noise

The opportunities include noise reductions arising from improved technology and changed flight operations.

Our response covered Heathrow’s Noise Objectives and Airspace Design Principles, and also recommended an overall decision framework.

Noise Objectives

Heathrow’s Airspace principles currently have three noise objectives:

(a) Limit and where possible reduce the number of people in the UK adversely affected by noise

(b) Share benefits from future noise improvements between the aviation industry and local communities

(c) Strike a fair balance between the negative aspects of noise and the positive economic impacts of flights

The Richmond Heathrow Campaign believes there should be the following two crucial updates to these objectives.

1. Amend Noise Objective (a) to incorporate WHO (World Health Organisation) guidelines, establishing their legal status, and a UK strategy and timetable for meeting them.  In particular, these guidelines recommend that a fixed interval of 8 hours is a minimal choice for night protection from the effects of noise.

2. Add a fourth Community Noise Objective: Where there is a reduction in overall noise the benefit should be applied to those already most affected and where there is an increase in overall noise the dis-benefit should be applied to those already least affected.

Airspace Design Principles

The Richmond Heathrow Campaign’s response also made 13 further recommendations on airspace design principles. These cover safety, flight dispersion, flight frequency, noise respite, flight path separation, flight path concentration and performance based navigation (PBN), less noisy aircraft fleet, ICAO* land use requirements, runway length and parallel operation, ICAO* flight operational requirements, London’s parks, night noise, and altitude based priorities.

* ICAO is the acronym for the United Nations International Civil Aviation Organisation.

Integrated Decision Framework

The Richmond Heathrow Campaign also recommended that there should be an integrated decision framework to bring together design principles and stakeholder interests in order to minimise noise impact the share the costs and benefits of noise mitigation both rationally and fairly.

 

We continue to play a leading part in the Heathrow Community Noise Forum (HCNF) to reduce the impact of aircraft noise on Heathrow, and to minimise or eliminate the impact of any changes to airspace design.

A more detailed summary of our response, the full response, and a presentation of the response to HCNF can be found here on our website.

 

New Members’ Reception 7 September 2018

Richmond Society New Members 7 Sep 2018

New members were welcomed into the Richmond Society at a reception hosted by our Membership Secretary, Ginny Curry on Friday 7 September. On hand to greet them were some of the Trustees responsible for the day-to-day running of the Society.

Join us! It’s only £5 a year.

Two new Telescopes on Richmond Hill

Congratulations to our friends at Thames Landscape Strategy on the opening of two new telescopes on Richmond Hill.  These are in memory of Air Commodore Robin Spaight CBE, whose wife Pat is Secretary of TLS and also of the Richmond Society.

Richmond upon Thames Mayor Cllr Ben Khosa performed the honours with Pat and Ellen LeCompte, a Trustee of Scenic Virginia, who is currently visiting from Richmond, Virginia.
Richmond MP Zac Goldsmith also dropped by.

The telescopes replace an earlier one which was installed on the Terrace in 2014 to mark the 20th anniversary of TLS. That one was stolen after a few months.

Heathrow Third Runway – the fight goes on

Picture of British Airways over Richmond on approach path to HeathrowThe Richmond Heathrow Campaign has continued to work tirelessly on your behalf to oppose the proposals to build a Third Runway at Heathrow. Of necessity our work over the past few years has focussed on responding to Government consultations and lobbying those parts of government involved in the process. In 2018 alone so far, we have submitted seven responses to consultations amounting to over 150 pages of detailed research (link).

Much of our work has aimed to highlight the weakness of the economic and commercial cases for Heathrow. Is the runway financeable, or will we taxpayers be expected to pay up eventually? Is it justifiable, given that according to recent DfT estimates barely any of its activity would be for business passengers and much would cannibalise growth from other UK airports or be wasted in international transfers?  That these ideas are now entering mainstream discussion is at least partly due to our efforts.

On Monday night, the House of Commons voted in favour of Heathrow expansion.  This vote was not unexpected, and in many respects all it does is to initiate the stage where judicial reviews will be sought and popular action planned.  It’s also worth noting that although the Labour Party allowed a free vote, it is now officially opposed to expansion (link).  The SNP, which had originally stated they would vote in favour, abstained.  Time is against Heathrow expansion as more decision makers become aware of the poor case for it.  Our campaign continues.

Richmond Heathrow Campaign communiqué
following the House of Commons Vote on Monday 27 June 2018

It is disappointing that Parliament voted last night in favour of the Government’s National Policy Statement on Heathrow expansion. All the evidence shows a third runway at Heathrow to be a costly mistake, bringing no benefit for UK business connectivity, perpetuating an outdated model of “hub” airports rather than anticipating demand for point-to-point travel, and ignoring the effects on public health from noise and air pollution for the substantial numbers of people living under the flight paths and near roads leading to the airport.

There is a high chance the scheme will not be delivered as Heathrow and the Government face the reality of the financial costs, the impacts on international climate change obligations and the failure to show how legal requirements on air quality can be met

The Richmond Heathrow Campaign (RHC) will continue to work with Local Councils, the London Mayor and others to support the legal challenges which will start now. We base our objections to expansion at Heathrow on the clear evidence against the decision contained in the Government’s own documents which we have examined in great detail. This has been a flawed consultation, failing to look at the facts.

We will also be continuing to look at how Heathrow and the Government can be held to account for promises made to the local community on noise reduction. Heathrow has already formally applied to the Civil Aviation Authority to change the airspace to accommodate more flights. The decisions may take several years and we are actively engaged in the process, having already lodged an objection concerning Heathrow’s lack of proper engagement with local communities and the way flight path decisions are being made.

Whilst most commentators have been focussing on the decision to expand Heathrow, few have noted the significant impact that new flight paths currently being considered will have on thousands of Londoners, with or without Heathrow expansion. Some areas will be overflown for the first time, some will have increased noise and a few less. Decisions on the location of flight paths will be fraught. Communities exposed to arrivals on the southern runway will probably see the 8 hours of daily respite cut in half.

We will continue our fight for a night time ban on flights, no increase in flights in the “shoulder periods” (23.00-23.30 and 06.00-07.00), no loss of respite periods, no increase in noise for those already exposed to noise and a cap on the number of flights and passengers, adequate compensation/mitigation from Heathrow to communities affected by noise and no increase in noise and other pollutants affecting the Royal Botanic Gardens which could threaten its status as a World Heritage Site. We will also continue to campaign for noise limits to be placed on a legal footing, based on World Health Organisation standards so that the public has better protection from the effects of noise on health.

The next stage in the decision process (apart from a judicial review by local authorities and the flight path design) is for Heathrow to prepare a detailed business plan and submit it to the UK planning inspectorate. We expect to participate and strongly object during the course of the planning process over the next two years.

Notes

RHC represents three amenity groups in the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames: The Richmond Society, The Friends of Richmond Green, and the Kew Society, which together have over 2000 members. The members of our amenity groups are adversely affected by noise from Heathrow Airport’s flight paths, poor air quality and road and rail congestion in west London. We acknowledge Heathrow’s contribution to the UK economy and seek constructive engagement in pursuit of a better Heathrow. We are an active participant in the Heathrow Community Noise Forum.

The RHC has a substantial body of evidence based reports on its website here: http://www.richmondheathrowcampaign.org

The future of Richmond’s surviving red telephone kiosks

K6 telephone box at St MatthiasMany months down the line and after repeated requests, details are still awaited from the Council of its scheme for the adoption of redundant, former BT, K.6-type telephone kiosks in the Town and potential funding for their repair and restoration.

Some thirty years ago, at the time that BT was proposing the removal of the long-familiar red kiosks from cities, towns and villages across the country and their replacement with inferior models, the Richmond Society was directly involved in securing the listing of four of the then almost forty Giles Gilbert-Scott designed kiosks in the Town and their restoration – such as the two outside The Prince’s Head on The Green.

Years later, the few surviving kiosks are once again threatened – this time with redundancy and disuse.

Whilst the recent successful restoration of the two kiosks on The Green is to be welcomed, the future of others, such as the listed kiosks in The Vineyard and on Richmond Bridge and the unlisted kiosk at the head of Albany Passage near the top of King’s Road, for which the Council rightly but unsuccessfully sought listing remains unclear. The Council’s acquisition of these kiosks from BT is a welcome first step. However, adoption by one of more groups in the local community and their potential conversion for other appropriate purposes, together with their restoration and future maintenance have yet to be pursued.

The Society’s Executive Committee has agreed to support the Council in seeking to persuade Historic England to review its decision to reject the listing of the kiosk outside St Matthias’ Church and looks forward to hearing from members interested in the potential adoption and re-use of this and the listed kiosk in the Vineyard.

The Byways of Richmond walk

Paul Velluet at the K6 phone boxes on The Green, Richmond, leading the walk around the Byways of Richmond About 50 members and guests turned up for the Society’s inaugural heritage walk of the 2018 season – an exploration of many of the byways of Richmond including the town’s historic lanes, courts and alleyways on a fine, summery evening. It was led by Paul Velluet, seen in the photo during a pause by two of the red telephone kiosks close to The Prince’s Head on The Green, now preserved and listed thanks to The Richmond Society’s intervention some years ago. Richmond used to have 40 of these iconic phone boxes, now there are only four.

Such was the success of the tour that the size of the group precluded deeper exploration into some of the smaller lanes and a plan to end the evening with an adjournment to The Victoria, Richmond’s smallest pub on the lower slopes of Richmond Hill, had to be abandoned. Many of us ended up in The Duke’s Head in The Vineyard, where more anecdotes about Richmond’s rich heritage were exchanged.

The next walk is on Wednesday 23 May. The title is From The Lass to the Marshgate: The Queen’s Road Estate, Pesthouse Common and Courtlands. A visit to the former Parish Workhouse of 1787, now converted to residential apartments, is included.

New Chairman – Barry May

Photo of Barry May, the Richmond Society's new ChairmanThe Richmond Society has a new Chairman.

He is Barry May (photo), formerly a reporter on the Richmond & Twickenham Times who became a foreign correspondent and editor for Reuters. He has been a member of the Society since 2002.

“I was born, raised and went to school in Richmond upon Thames,” Barry said. “So my roots here are deep, and although I’ve been fortunate to travel widely around the world my heart was always in Richmond. Nowhere else compares. I’m looking forward to playing a part in making it even better.”

Barry is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts, a Freeman of the City of London, and a member of several social, cultural and geopolitical organisations. He is married with two sons, and lives in Richmond.

His predecessor, Professor Ian Bruce, stepped down in December to fulfil family commitments. After five years as Chairman, he is now a Patron of the Society.